(no subject)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
19 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

(no subject)

Walid Salman
Hello,

I have an video and neet to split it, so I use this command :

[root@ns1 ~]# ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss
00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4

the server show this error :

FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers
  built on Jan 29 2012 17:52:15 with gcc 4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6)
  configuration: --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --shlibdir=/usr/lib64
--mandir=/usr/share/man --incdir=/usr/include --disable-avisynth
--extra-cflags='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC'
--enable-avfilter --enable-avfilter-lavf --enable-libdc1394
--enable-libdirac --enable-libfaac --enable-libfaad --enable-libfaadbin
--enable-libgsm --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb
--enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-librtmp --enable-libschroedinger
--enable-libspeex --enable-libtheora --enable-libx264 --enable-gpl
--enable-nonfree --enable-postproc --enable-pthreads --enable-shared
--enable-swscale --enable-vdpau --enable-version3 --enable-x11grab
  libavutil     50.15. 1 / 50.15. 1
  libavcodec    52.72. 2 / 52.72. 2
  libavformat   52.64. 2 / 52.64. 2
  libavdevice   52. 2. 0 / 52. 2. 0
  libavfilter    1.19. 0 /  1.19. 0
  libswscale     0.11. 0 /  0.11. 0
  libpostproc   51. 2. 0 / 51. 2. 0

Seems stream 0 codec frame rate differs from container frame rate: 48.00
(705505/14698) -> 24.00 (705505/29396)
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from
'/home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf56.40.101
    comment         : http://www.aparat.com/kshahrvandi
  Duration: 00:00:58.88, start: 0.-46440, bitrate: 662 kb/s
    Stream #0.0(eng): Video: h264, yuv420p, 640x360 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 562
kb/s, 24 fps, 24 tbr, 705505.00 tbn, 48 tbc
    Stream #0.1(eng): Audio: aac, 44100 Hz, stereo, s16, 96 kb/s
Unrecognized option 'to'

Some one to help me ...
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Carl Eugen Hoyos
Walid Salman <bza.salman <at> gmail.com> writes:

> FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers

As explained, this is not supported, please do not
continue to ask questions about it.

Please remember no to top-post here and do not send
messages without subject.

Carl Eugen

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
RDP
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

RDP
In reply to this post by Walid Salman
On 24 Jul 2016 4:45 p.m., "Walid Salman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I have an video and neet to split it, so I use this command :
>
> [root@ns1 ~]# ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss
> 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4
>
> the server show this error :
>
> FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c) 2000-2010

Nothing wrong with the command syntax, works perfectly..  but there may
well be some major head scratching as to why you're using such an ancient
version of ffmpeg!!  0.6.5??  Really?  ;o)
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Cley Faye
In reply to this post by Walid Salman
2016-07-24 17:45 GMT+02:00 Walid Salman <[hidden email]>:

>
> [root@ns1 ~]
> ​​
> # ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss
> 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4
>
> the server show this error :
>
> FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers
>   built on Jan 29 2012 17:52:15 with gcc 4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6)
>   configuration: --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --shlibdir=/usr/lib64
> --mandir=/usr/share/man --incdir=/usr/include --disable-avisynth
> --extra-cflags='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
> -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC'
> --enable-avfilter --enable-avfilter-lavf --enable-libdc1394
> --enable-libdirac --enable-libfaac --enable-libfaad --enable-libfaadbin
> --enable-libgsm --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb
> --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-librtmp --enable-libschroedinger
> --enable-libspeex --enable-libtheora --enable-libx264 --enable-gpl
> --enable-nonfree --enable-postproc --enable-pthreads --enable-shared
> --enable-swscale --enable-vdpau --enable-version3 --enable-x11grab
>   libavutil     50.15. 1 / 50.15. 1
>   libavcodec    52.72. 2 / 52.72. 2
>   libavformat   52.64. 2 / 52.64. 2
>   libavdevice   52. 2. 0 / 52. 2. 0
>   libavfilter    1.19. 0 /  1.19. 0
>   libswscale     0.11. 0 /  0.11. 0
>   libpostproc   51. 2. 0 / 51. 2. 0
>
> Seems stream 0 codec frame rate differs from container frame rate: 48.00
> (705505/14698) -> 24.00 (705505/29396)
> Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from
> '/home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4':
>   Metadata:
>     major_brand     : isom
>     minor_version   : 512
>     compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
>     encoder         : Lavf56.40.101
>     comment         : http://www.aparat.com/kshahrvandi
>   Duration: 00:00:58.88, start: 0.-46440, bitrate: 662 kb/s
>     Stream #0.0(eng): Video: h264, yuv420p, 640x360 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 562
> kb/s, 24 fps, 24 tbr, 705505.00 tbn, 48 tbc
>     Stream #0.1(eng): Audio: aac, 44100 Hz, stereo, s16, 96 kb/s
> Unrecognized option 'to'


​There are multiple ways to do this, but I assume in this case you want
your input to start at 00:00:10 and end at 00:00:20 from the input video ?
First, know that using copy, it is possible that the cut won't begin
exactly where you want it: to produce a readable output, a lot of codecs
requires the stream to start on an iframe. If you want exact cut, you might
need to reencode a part of your video.

Second, I believe that this time (I was wrong on this before), you want to
-ss and -to to be *input* options and not *output* options. With ffmpeg,
the argument order is important: any option related to an input or an
output must be provided before the input/output. If you have an option that
is related to an input, it must be before the corresponding "-i".
Also note that depending on which option you choose, the relative timestamp
of your input might change. The "-t" option allows you to specify a
duration instead of a timestamp if this is an issue.​

​If I'm not wrong, your command line would look something like this:​
​​# ffmpeg -ss 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -i
/home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -c copy
/home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4​

​Here, "-ss" and "-to" relate to the input file, "​-c copy" relate to the
output.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Phil Rhodes
In reply to this post by Carl Eugen Hoyos
> As explained, this is not supported
Well, Carl Eugen, it may not be supported by you, but other people may be able to help.
Please, if you aren't interested in getting involved in a discussion, simply ignore it.
-Phil
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Carl Eugen Hoyos
Phil Rhodes <phil_rhodes <at> rocketmail.com> writes:

> > As explained, this is not supported
> Well, Carl Eugen, it may not be supported by you,

It isn't.

> but other people may be able to help.

No.

The version used by the OP has known security issues
and known bugs. Nobody stepped forward over the last
years to continue support for it, so we do know that
it actually is unsupported.
(As was explained by others before I answered.)

Note that the tries to help the OP will only lead to
more misunderstandings: Options that he cannot use are
incorrectly explained...

> Please, if you aren't interested in getting involved
> in a discussion, simply ignore it.

Yes, this is what I would honestly like you to do.

But as I learned over the last decade, this is a
desperate and unsatisfiable hope...

Carl Eugen

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Phil Rhodes
> The version used by the OP has known security issues> and known bugs. Nobody stepped forward over the last > years to continue support for it, so we do know that > it actually is unsupported.
That's his problem - it's nothing to do with you. If someone wants to ask a question here and someone else wants to answer it, they can if they want, and it isn't your place to try to stop them.
I have no idea why you insist on this campaign of hatred against anyone who attempts to use this list outside of your personal and microscopically-narrow definition of acceptability. Almost every post you make exhibits complete contempt for the people you're addressing.
You can't do this an expect everyone to be completely happy with it. It's utterly unnecessary.
P

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
RDP
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

RDP
In reply to this post by Carl Eugen Hoyos
On 24 Jul 2016 5:30 p.m., "Carl Eugen Hoyos" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Phil Rhodes <phil_rhodes <at> rocketmail.com> writes:
> > Please, if you aren't interested in getting involved
> > in a discussion, simply ignore it.
>
> Yes, this is what I would honestly like you to do.
>
> But as I learned over the last decade, this is a
> desperate and unsatisfiable hope..

Touché!  ;o)

(.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder..
telling me the rocketmail address is misconfigured.. ).
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Carl Eugen Hoyos
In reply to this post by Phil Rhodes
Phil Rhodes <phil_rhodes <at> rocketmail.com> writes:

> That's his problem - it's nothing to do with you.

This is (unfortunately!) not correct:
As you have pointed out, I give support to users on this
mailing list. Where I live, I may be made responsible for
not telling users that they are using (old) versions of
FFmpeg that do have known issues.
This is also the reason why avconv (that has a usually
identical syntax as ffmpeg) cannot be supported on this
mailing list: It has both security issues and known
encoding issues, so we - imo - have to tell people that
it is not supported here.

[...]

> I have no idea why you insist on this campaign of hatred
> against anyone who attempts to use this list outside
> of your personal and microscopically-narrow definition of
> acceptability. Almost every post you make exhibits
> complete contempt for the people you're addressing.

We did accept all kinds of insults in the past.
Please understand that this has changed now, you are not
allowed anymore to speak open on our mailing lists, you
have to suppress you arrogant manors.

Please fix your quoting, Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Nicolas George
In reply to this post by RDP
Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit :
> (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder..

That means your spam filter does its job.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Reindl Harald


Am 24.07.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Nicolas George:
> Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit :
>> (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder..
>
> That means your spam filter does its job

or it does an d the yahoo server which randomly was used for that
message was on too much RBL's this time since Yahoo is *one pf the
major* spam supporters even allowing forged envelope senders

Received: from nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
(nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.140])

spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net LISTED 127.0.0.6


_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".

signature.asc (188 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Phil Rhodes
In reply to this post by Carl Eugen Hoyos
> Please understand that this has changed now, you are not> allowed anymore to speak open on our mailing lists, you > have to suppress you arrogant manors.
That's "manners," you insolent prick.
But in any case, the idea that I'm going to accept advice from you on good behaviour is hilarious. You are one of the most arrogant, condescending people I've ever come across. Your presumptiveness is absolutely astounding, and you do it every day. I post a few times a year.
Tellingly, whenever I have met people in person who use this list, your staggering rudeness has, without exception, been a topic of conversation. You're a laughing stock. Please be aware that you are tolerated for your technical knowledge; you are certainly not liked, at least not by any of the list users I've met. Whether you have some sort of psychological condition which renders you unable to understand this situation I don't know, but it isn't really my problem: it is nonetheless true.
Doubtless you're very sure of your position, so I'm sure you won't mind posting this publicly.
P  
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
RDP
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

RDP
In reply to this post by Nicolas George
On 24 Jul 2016 5:51 p.m., "Nicolas George" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit :
> > (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam
folder..
>
> That means your spam filter does its job.

I know!  Though there *was* an intentional double entendre in there (
somewhere )..

.. and I think you meant *is* doing its job?  ;o)

[ Exeunts rapidly Stage Left ( with broad grin ) before I too suffer slings
and arrows.. ]
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Reindl Harald
In reply to this post by Phil Rhodes


Am 24.07.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
>>  Please understand that this has changed now, you are not> allowed anymore to speak open on our mailing lists, you > have to suppress you arrogant manors.
> That's "manners," you insolent prick.
> But in any case, the idea that I'm going to accept advice from you on good behaviour is hilarious. You are one of the most arrogant, condescending people I've ever come across. Your presumptiveness is absolutely astounding, and you do it every day. I post a few times a year.
> Tellingly, whenever I have met people in person who use this list, your staggering rudeness has, without exception, been a topic of conversation. You're a laughing stock. Please be aware that you are tolerated for your technical knowledge; you are certainly not liked, at least not by any of the list users I've met. Whether you have some sort of psychological condition which renders you unable to understand this situation I don't know, but it isn't really my problem: it is nonetheless true.
> Doubtless you're very sure of your position, so I'm sure you won't mind posting this publicly.

piss somewehre in the wood - you are trolling over years here


_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".

signature.asc (188 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Phil Rhodes
> you are trolling over years here

This is not true.
I have pointed out problems with some of the basic video engineering in ffmpeg. I have also criticised Carl Eugen when he's been rude, which even his greatest admirer would have to admit is something he does almost constantly.
I'm not here to cause trouble. I consider both of those things to be relevant and useful contributions.
P
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Moritz Barsnick
In reply to this post by Cley Faye
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 18:16:14 +0200, Cley Faye wrote:
> of your input might change. The "-t" option allows you to specify a
> duration instead of a timestamp if this is an issue.

With that very old version of ffmpeg, he would have to, as it doesn't
support "-to". ;-)

> If I'm not wrong, your command line would look something like this:
> # ffmpeg -ss 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -i
> /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -c copy
> /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4

Let me add that you need to be prepared for surprises. To quote the
wiki:
"Note that if you specify -ss before -i only, the timestamps will be
reset to zero, so -t and -to have not the same effect. If you want to
keep the original timestamps, add the -copyts option."

Please see some of the examples here (none of them using "-to" as an
input option by the way):
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Seeking#Cuttingsmallsections

Moritz

P.S.: Thanks for a technical email. The list doesn't get many these
      days. ;) But I too agree ffmpeg-0.6.x really shouldn't be
      supported. With 2.8.x I wouldn't be so hard on the poster.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
RDP
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

RDP
In reply to this post by Phil Rhodes
On 24 Jul 2016 6:09 p.m., "Phil Rhodes" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I have also criticised Carl Eugen when he's been >rude, which even his
greatest admirer would have to >admit is something he does almost
constantly.

With all due respect, would it not be bright and better idea to take any
cat-fighting Off-List, gentlemen?  ;o)  Then make up, and go buy each other
a pint?

As to being brusque ( better description ), there are those who are very
protective of their projects, or those they are actively involved in.
Prime example? Linus Torvalds' candid take his own impatience and temper (
check out http://ted.com )

Chris
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Carl Eugen Hoyos
In reply to this post by Moritz Barsnick
Moritz Barsnick <barsnick <at> gmx.net> writes:

> With that very old version of ffmpeg, he would have to,
> as it doesn't support "-to".

Which imo makes the whole try to support the OP less
helpful, sorry.

Carl Eugen

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (no subject)

Carl Eugen Hoyos
In reply to this post by Phil Rhodes
Phil Rhodes <phil_rhodes <at> rocketmail.com> writes:

> That's "manners," you insolent prick.

Thank you for correcting me, as you probably assumed, I am
not a native speaker.

[...]

> Please be aware that you are tolerated for your technical
> knowledge

That surprises me very much given that among all contributors
I probably have least technical knowledge.

As said, your quoting looks broken here, please try to fix it.

Carl Eugen

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".