AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png

Mark Filipak
Howdy,

Look at the attachment. I made it from this:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080501082420/http://heptium.sh.cvut.cz:80/~integra/deint/

Can you identify the modern ffmpeg equivalent of any of them?

Thanks,
Mark.
--
COVID-19 perspective (May 7, 2020):
The U.S. is 4% of world population, 33% of cases, 28% of deaths, increasing.
The U.S. & S.Korea reported 1st cases on the same day.
In March, week 2, S.Korea (pop: 52 million) did 10,000 tests/day, 4 hour results.
In March, week 2, the U.S. (pop: 328 million) did 400 tests/day, 7 day results.

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".

AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png (785K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png

Paul B Mahol
On 5/8/20, Mark Filipak <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Look at the attachment. I made it from this:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20080501082420/http://heptium.sh.cvut.cz:80/~integra/deint/
>
> Can you identify the modern ffmpeg equivalent of any of them?
>

No, I can not.

> Thanks,
> Mark.
> --
> COVID-19 perspective (May 7, 2020):
> The U.S. is 4% of world population, 33% of cases, 28% of deaths,
> increasing.
> The U.S. & S.Korea reported 1st cases on the same day.
> In March, week 2, S.Korea (pop: 52 million) did 10,000 tests/day, 4 hour
> results.
> In March, week 2, the U.S. (pop: 328 million) did 400 tests/day, 7 day
> results.
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png

Carl Eugen Hoyos-2
In reply to this post by Mark Filipak


> Am 08.05.2020 um 18:51 schrieb Mark Filipak <[hidden email]>:
>
>
> Look at the attachment. I made it from this:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20080501082420/http://heptium.sh.cvut.cz:80/~integra/deint/

The following is a little more relevant but both posts are from a time when the good de-interlacers were unable to work in real-time on real hardware. Since this is not true anymore, the value of the posts is very limited.
https://guru.multimedia.cx/deinterlacing-filters/comment-page-1/

Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png

Francois Visagie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Carl Eugen Hoyos
> Sent: 09 May 2020 08:12
> To: FFmpeg user questions
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png
>
>
>
> > Am 08.05.2020 um 18:51 schrieb Mark Filipak
> <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >
> > Look at the attachment. I made it from this:
> > https://web.archive.org/web/20080501082420/http://heptium.sh.cvut.cz:8
> > 0/~integra/deint/
>
> The following is a little more relevant but both posts are from a time when
> the good de-interlacers were unable to work in real-time on real hardware.
> Since this is not true anymore, the value of the posts is very limited.
> https://guru.multimedia.cx/deinterlacing-filters/comment-page-1/

@Mark, fully agreed with Carl Eugen's point.

It's unclear whether your interest in Avisynth extends beyond merely comparing against some other tool, but if it does you should be looking at more modern AVS deinterlacers from the time of QTGMC (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=174544) and onward.

>
> Carl Eugen
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [hidden email]
> with subject "unsubscribe".

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AviSynth Deinterlacers Comparison.png

Mark Filipak
On 05/09/2020 10:01 AM, Francois Visagie wrote:

>> From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>> Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> Am 08.05.2020 um 18:51 schrieb Mark Filipak
>>>
>>> Look at the attachment. I made it from this:
>>> https://web.archive.org/web/20080501082420/http://heptium.sh.cvut.cz:8
>>> 0/~integra/deint/
>>
>> The following is a little more relevant but both posts are from a time when
>> the good de-interlacers were unable to work in real-time on real hardware.
>> Since this is not true anymore, the value of the posts is very limited.
>> https://guru.multimedia.cx/deinterlacing-filters/comment-page-1/
>
> @Mark, fully agreed with Carl Eugen's point.
>
> It's unclear whether your interest in Avisynth extends beyond merely comparing against some other tool, but if it does you should be looking at more modern AVS deinterlacers from the time of QTGMC (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=174544) and onward.

I'm not interested in Avisynth, Francois. I'm interested in motion compensation and, as seen in the
picture I attached to my thread-starter, there used to be some that supposedly worked. I seek their
equivalents in ffmpeg. I've not found an MC filter that works well.

Regards,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[hidden email] with subject "unsubscribe".